WINNERS 2017

CASE VALIO

WINNING TEAM: 6

Comments from the judges: Food waste is a huge problem –> real solution. Not totally new innovation but nicely updated technology development. High quality product with consumer benefits. Very good presentation including facts and calculation.

 

CASE SANDVIK MINING AND CONSTRUCTION

WINNING TEAM: 16

Comments from the judges: Assignment has been diversely understood. Possible to execute in year 2030. Nice environmental elements.

 

CASE PIHLAJALINNA

WINNING TEAM: 20

Comments from the judges: Team has stepped into young people’s position and picked a service channel that interests them. Still they strongly incorporate young people into the development of the service which is vital in customer oriented service development. Video producing: it was made very easy for us to get the partners for that as well. Service includes all young people’s matters. Thank you! 

 

CASE BRIGHT

WINNING TEAM: 34

Comments from the judges: Ready to go solution. Product which increases the business. Innovative.

 

CASE CITY OF TAMPERE / TRAMWAY

WINNING TEAM: 35

Comments from the judges: Brave presentation, appealed to emotions. Good, concrete ideas that are possible to execute for different user groups. Most balanced over all.

 

CASE TAMPERE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

WINNING TEAM: 48

Comments from the judges: Idea solves the problem versatilely. Innovativeness excellent. Human contact and technology interacting. Good ideas for guiding, which had been taken to concrete level. Presentation was visually impressive.

 

CASE RESTAMAX RESTAURANT GROUP

WINNING TEAM: 54

Comments from the judges: Nearly complete concept: immediately possible to execute. Possibility to improve, different versions, adjustable. Enables an experiment as part of a restaurant.

 

CASE SÄRKÄNNIEMI

WINNING TEAM: 63

Comments from the judges: Base idea works and the pop up possibility is interesting. Meets the requirements of the assignment.

 

CASE TAMPEREEN SÄHKÖLAITOS

WINNING TEAM: 72

Comments from the judges: Answers the assignment. Realistic, practical, good beneficial standpoint. Convincing performer.

 

CASE SRV

WINNING TEAM: 75

Comments from the judges: Represents the future, but possible to execute. Very scalable “platform”. Can be utilised already during construction. Opens up new earning possibilities for the arena’s operators both during events and outside of them. Enables the possibility to bring memorable/gaming operators as part of the arena experience.

 

CASE TAMPERE AREENA

WINNING TEAM: 90

Comments from the judges: Team had taken into account sports and culture. All age groups had been considered. Used material had been listed in the solution.

 

CASE PATRIA OYJ

WINNING TEAM: 94

Comments from the judges: One system. Possible to duplicate. Simplicity was appealing.